PERINVO INSIGHTS / JOB EVALUATION & TOTAL REWARDS

Hay Methodology: Understanding Job Value Before Setting Pay

A practical guide to Know-How, Problem Solving and Accountability , with worked examples, grading decisions and the controls that make evaluation credible.

Job Evaluation Hay Guide Chart-Profile Job Grading Internal Equity Compensation Strategy

By Perinvo Consulting · Practical insights for HR, Finance and business leaders

A job title can be misleading. Two managers may share the same title while working with very different levels of technical expertise, complexity, authority and impact. Hay Methodology, often called the Hay Guide Chart-Profile Method, provides a structured way to examine these differences. It helps organizations compare the relative size of jobs using consistent criteria rather than relying on titles, seniority or negotiating power.

This guide starts with the three factors and then walks through the Senior Engineer and Marketing Manager examples in the supplied learning material. It also shows how to move from evaluation results to internal grades, salary decisions and ongoing governance.

01. What is the Hay Guide Chart-Profile Method?

The method evaluates the requirements and expected contribution of a job through three connected questions: What knowledge is required? What thinking is required to use it? and What results is the job accountable for? The three factors are evaluated together to understand the size and nature of the role.

The value comes from the combination. A role may need deep expert knowledge with limited management responsibility; another may need broad decision-making authority and accountability for major outcomes. Neither should be graded from its title alone.

02. The three Hay factors , explained in plain English

Factor 1: Know-How , what the job must know and do

Know-How covers the knowledge, practical skills and experience required for competent job performance. The source material distinguishes technical expertise, managerial breadth and interpersonal or human relations skills. These are requirements of the position, not the qualifications the current employee happens to hold.

Factor 2: Problem Solving , how challenging is the thinking?

Problem Solving examines the level of analysis, judgement and innovation needed to apply the role’s know-how. The supplied PDF describes the score as a proportion of the Know-How score. Its two perspectives are the thinking environment (how much guidance exists) and the thinking challenge (how novel or complex the questions are).

Factor 3: Accountability , what results can the role influence?

Accountability considers freedom to act, the size or scope of operations influenced, and the nature of the role’s impact on outcomes. This is not the same as the number of direct reports. A specialist may have few direct reports but major influence on safety, investment decisions or technical risk.

03. From job description to an evaluation decision

A disciplined evaluation is a sequence of decisions. Each stage should leave clear evidence, an agreed outcome and an owner. This workflow translates the source methodology into a practical internal process.

04. Worked example 1: Senior Engineer , 920 points

The first example in the source material describes a Senior Engineer with advanced electrical-systems knowledge, responsibility for a five-person team and coordination across functions. The educational scoring is shown below exactly in substance, with the arithmetic made explicit.

The learning document associates this score with an illustrative annual salary range of $80,000–$100,000. That amount is a classroom assumption, not evidence of the market rate for engineers in any country or sector.

05. Worked example 2: Marketing Manager , 988 points

The second example evaluates a Marketing Manager who oversees ten marketers, works with internal teams and external partners, and makes decisions on marketing initiatives. It offers a complete path from factor scores to a sample grade.

06. From evaluation points to grades and salary bands

The source PDF groups scores into four sample internal grades. The Marketing Manager’s 988 points fall inside the 801–1,000 band, producing Grade 6. The Senior Engineer’s 920 points would also fall in that band if the same illustration is used. However, the ranges below are an example grade table, not a universal Korn Ferry grading standard.

In practice, two separate decisions are required: job evaluation supports the relative internal grade; salary structure design determines the pay range using external benchmarks, internal equity, total rewards policy and the organization’s budget. A job score alone never proves the correct salary.

07. Hay Methodology vs a generic point-factor scheme

Both approaches evaluate jobs analytically, but they are not the same scoring system. It is useful to understand the difference, especially when teams try to turn educational examples into live salary policies.

One lesson is common to both: evaluate the demands of the job, not the traits, qualifications or performance of its current holder. A fair framework should not reward a preferred individual by changing the job score.

08. What can go wrong , and how to prevent it

09. A practical rollout plan for HR and business leaders

A credible job evaluation project should be manageable for HR, Finance and business leaders. Start with a representative pilot, then expand after testing consistency and approval rules.

10. Five KPIs to make evaluation useful after launch

These KPIs tell leaders whether the process is being applied. They do not, on their own, prove legal compliance, fair pay or correct individual salary decisions. Use them as signals for investigation, not as substitutes for judgement and evidence.

11. Five questions CEOs and HR leaders should ask

1. Can we explain the job’s Know-How, Problem Solving and Accountability using documented evidence?
2. Would the same job receive the same evaluation if a different employee held it?
3. Are jobs calibrated consistently across Finance, Operations, Technical and Commercial functions?
4. Have we separated internal job value from market prices and individual performance?
5. Who approves a new grade, reviews a challenged score and tracks the downstream salary impact?

12. Further reading and source notes

Article basis: the attached four-page learning PDF titled Hay Methodology. Its numerical Senior Engineer and Marketing Manager examples are reproduced as simplified educational calculations with explicit limitations.

© Perinvo Consulting 2026 · Perinvo Insights · Organization Design | Job Evaluation | Total Rewards | Business Transformation